Reviews in Edinburgh and London

Societal Issues, Criticisms, and Advocates of Reform

© Kathleen Airdrie

Oct 9, 2009
George IV Coronation Banquet Westminster Hall 1821, Public Domain
The humanitarian movement that brought about the French Revolution is often cited as the catalyst for calls for reform.

In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, writers and some politicians increasingly called for wider democracy.

Edinburgh Review in Scotland

London’s supremacy as the centre of literary achievement was rivaled by Edinburgh, the seat of a flourishing university. A group in that Scottish city, determined to be help bring about change, made plans for a new publication.

On October 10, 1802, the Edinburgh Review quarterly published its first edition. Its founders were Francis Jeffrey, Henry Erskine, and Sydney Smith. The publishers were Constable in Edinburgh and Longman’s in London. The name was not new, as about fifty years earlier an Edinburgh Review appeared, but failed after two editions.

The founders aspired to enlighten the minds of the public through highly politicized reviews. They wanted to promote what they believed to be more liberal and popular systems of government. Francis Jeffrey, a strong supporter of the Whig party, exercised immense influence on periodical literature as editor from 1803 to 1829.

Henry Brougham, Francis Horner, Sydney Smith, Thomas Macaulay, William Thackeray, Thomas Carlyle, and Walter Scott (briefly) were among the contributors.

Literary Criticisms and Reform Advocates

The Edinburgh Review’s power was quickly acknowledged. It set the standard for British political and literary criticism. Liberally paid for their literary reviews and opinions, its contributors were men of strong convictions. Sometimes anonymously, writers attempted to bring about change through scathing comments on social and political conditions.

Over the years, it was a strong advocate of reforms in church, state, parliament, and popular education. It called for the end of slavery and the extension of suffrage. The Edinburgh Review, less radical in its later years, survived until 1929.

Quarterly Review in London, England

In opposition to the vigorous Edinburgh Review, the English Tories established their own publication, the Quarterly Review. First published in London in 1809, its first editor, William Gifford, was appointed by George Canning, the Foreign Minister.

Early contributors included Tory politicians George Canning, and Robert Cecil, and authors Robert Southey, Sir Walter Scott, William Wordsworth, and John W. Croker. Jane Austen’s career was launched at the Quarterly Review. Published by the celebrated London publisher John Murray, it became one of the most important journals of the 19th Century.

Old Principles Defended

Politically, the Quarterly Review defended the old principles and preservation of the status quo. Writers such as Charles Dickens and Percy Bysshe Shelley who favored political reform received hostile reviews of their work. A blistering review by Croker of John Keats’ “Endymion” was blamed for the poet’s death.

The Quarterly Review supported trade liberalization, moderate law reform. It was an advocate of humanitarian treatment for criminals and the insane and the gradual abolition of slavery. John G. Lockhart, son-in-law of Sir Walter Scott was editor during a very successful period. Publication of the Quarterly Review stopped in 1967.

Sources:

The World’s History and Its Makers by E. Sanderson, J. P. Lamberton, J. McGovern, O. H. G. Leigh, University History Publishing Company 1901

Reviews and Magazines in the Early Years of the Nineteenth Century


The copyright of the article Reviews in Edinburgh and London in Georgian/Victorian Britain is owned by Kathleen Airdrie. Permission to republish Reviews in Edinburgh and London in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


George IV Coronation Banquet Westminster Hall 1821, Public Domain
Edinburgh, Scotland 1802, Public Domain
Sydney Smith, Co-Founder Of Edinburgh Review, Public Domain
Quarterly Review, Public Domain
George Canning Of Quarterly Review, Public Domain


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo